Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Kingston Upon Thames›…KT9 2HP65 Leatherhead Road Chessington KT9 2HP›16/10476/TPO
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

16/10476/TPO.

65 Leatherhead Road Chessington KT9 2HP

Trees at 65 Leatherhead Road Chessington KT9 2HP, received 2 Dec 2016 — refused on 17 Jan 2017 (delegated, Ben Morgan).

Kingston Upon Thames›KT9 2HP›16/10476/TPO
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Jan 2017
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

T.1 Pine - Fell.

Reference
16/10476/TPO
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
2 Dec 2016
Target date
27 Jan 2017
Decision date
17 Jan 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
16/10476/TPO
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
2 Dec 2016
Target date
27 Jan 2017
Decision date
17 Jan 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Jan 2017, delegated decision by Ben Morgan — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Dec 2016
Application received
27 Jan 2017
Statutory target date
17 Jan 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Morgan
2 Dec 2016
Application received
27 Jan 2017
Statutory target date
17 Jan 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Morgan

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.