Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesTolworth & Hook Rise - OLD wardKT6 7RF193 Red Lion Road Tolworth Surbiton KT6 7RF21/02095/FUL
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

21/02095/FUL.

193 Red Lion Road Tolworth Surbiton KT6 7RF

Full / Other Planning at 193 Red Lion Road Tolworth Surbiton KT6 7RF, received 29 Jun 2021 — refused on 6 Sep 2021 (delegated, Helen Harris).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
6 Sep 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to carry out development without compliance with Condition 2 (Approved Plans) of Planning Permission ref: 18/10415/FUL (Conversion of single dwellinghouse in to two self contained flats. Erection of side porch and gate) dated 30/04/2019. Variation to internal configuration/occupancy

Reference
21/02095/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
29 Jun 2021
Validated
12 Jul 2021
Target date
6 Sep 2021
Decision date
6 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
21/02095/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
29 Jun 2021
Validated
12 Jul 2021
Target date
6 Sep 2021
Decision date
6 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
6 Sept 2021
OFFICERS REPORT
23 Aug 2021
101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
12 Jul 2021
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
29 Jun 2021
003 EXISTING SITE PLAN
29 Jun 2021
002 EXISTING ELEVATIONS REV A
29 Jun 2021
102 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS REV A
29 Jun 2021
103 PROPOSED SITE PLAN REV A
29 Jun 2021
101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS REV B
29 Jun 2021
001 EXISTING FLOOR PLANS REV A
29 Jun 2021
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
6 Sept 2021
OFFICERS REPORT
23 Aug 2021
101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
12 Jul 2021
Show all 10 rows
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
29 Jun 2021
003 EXISTING SITE PLAN
29 Jun 2021
002 EXISTING ELEVATIONS REV A
29 Jun 2021
102 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS REV A
29 Jun 2021
103 PROPOSED SITE PLAN REV A
29 Jun 2021
101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS REV B
29 Jun 2021
001 EXISTING FLOOR PLANS REV A
29 Jun 2021

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 6 Sep 2021, delegated decision by Helen Harris — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Jun 2021
Application received
12 Jul 2021
Application validated
6 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
6 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris
29 Jun 2021
Application received
12 Jul 2021
Application validated
6 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By reason of the removal of the consented 3 bedroom (family-sized unit) and the absence of any sound and robust evidence to justify this loss, the proposed development would conflict with Policy DM13 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames LDF Core Strategy, April 2012.
1
By reason of the removal of the consented 3 bedroom (family-sized unit) and the absence of any sound and robust evidence to justify this loss, the proposed development would conflict with Policy DM13 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames LDF Core Strategy, April 2012.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.