Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 2 Apr 2022, delegated decision by Aisha Stoll — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Feb 2022
Application received
4 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
2 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Aisha Stoll
7 Feb 2022
Application received
4 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
2 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Aisha Stoll
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Due to the siting and orientation of the proposed extension in relation to the closest opening at ground
floor level at No. 229 Red Lion Road, the proposal would not pass the 45-degree elevation test and as such
would likely result in a loss of light and increased overbearing appearance. The proposal is therefore
contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 and policy DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy 2012.
1
Due to the siting and orientation of the proposed extension in relation to the closest opening at ground
floor level at No. 229 Red Lion Road, the proposal would not pass the 45-degree elevation test and as such
would likely result in a loss of light and increased overbearing appearance. The proposal is therefore
contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 and policy DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy 2012.
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.