Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesNew Malden Village wardKT3 4DU77 Kings Avenue New Malden KT3 4DU23/01985/CPU
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

23/01985/CPU.

77 Kings Avenue New Malden KT3 4DU

Lawful Development Certificate at 77 Kings Avenue New Malden KT3 4DU, received 21 Jul 2023 — refused on 15 Sep 2023 (delegated, Nia Wilkinson).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Sep 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of rear L-shaped dormer roof extension and installation of 2no. rooflights to front roof slope to facilitate loft conversion

Reference
23/01985/CPU
Type
Cert of Lawful Use/Operation - Proposed
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
21 Jul 2023
Target date
15 Sep 2023
Decision date
15 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
23/01985/CPU
Type
Cert of Lawful Use/Operation - Proposed
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
21 Jul 2023
Target date
15 Sep 2023
Decision date
15 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - CPU
15 Sept 2023
OFFICER REPORT
15 Sept 2023
Application Form (No personal data)
21 Jul 2023
77KI-Existing Block and Location Plan
21 Jul 2023
PL01-77KI-A Proposed Plans
21 Jul 2023
EX01-77KI-A Existing Plans
21 Jul 2023
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - CPU
15 Sept 2023
OFFICER REPORT
15 Sept 2023
Application Form (No personal data)
21 Jul 2023
Show all 6 rows
77KI-Existing Block and Location Plan
21 Jul 2023
PL01-77KI-A Proposed Plans
21 Jul 2023
EX01-77KI-A Existing Plans
21 Jul 2023

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Sep 2023, delegated decision by Nia Wilkinson — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jul 2023
Application received
15 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
15 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nia Wilkinson
21 Jul 2023
Application received
15 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
15 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Nia Wilkinson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would comply with Condition B.2 (a) (similar materials to existing) of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
2
It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would comply with Condition B.2 (b) (i) (bb) (edge of enlargement closest to eaves of the original roof shall, so far practicable, not be less than 0.2 metres from the eaves, measures along the roof slope from the outside edge of the eaves) of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
1
It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would comply with Condition B.2 (a) (similar materials to existing) of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
2
It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would comply with Condition B.2 (b) (i) (bb) (edge of enlargement closest to eaves of the original roof shall, so far practicable, not be less than 0.2 metres from the eaves, measures along the roof slope from the outside edge of the eaves) of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.