Planning Atlas
Planning application · Lewisham

DC/00/045956/FT.

Lawful Development Certificate at an unrecorded address, received 3 Feb 2000 — approved on 4 Apr 2000 (delegated, Steve Isaacson).

LewishamDC/00/045956/FT
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationLewisham profile →
Approved
Outcome
4 Apr 2000
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lewisham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The council record carries no proposal text.

Reference
DC/00/045956/FT
Type
Lawful Development Certificate proposed
Site
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
3 Feb 2000
Validated
25 Feb 2000
Target date
20 Apr 2000
Decision date
4 Apr 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
DC/00/045956/FT
Type
Lawful Development Certificate proposed
Site
Not recorded
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
3 Feb 2000
Validated
25 Feb 2000
Target date
20 Apr 2000
Decision date
4 Apr 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Lewisham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 4 Apr 2000, delegated decision by Steve Isaacson — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 2000
Application received
25 Feb 2000
Application validated
20 Apr 2000
Statutory target date
4 Apr 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · Steve Isaacson
3 Feb 2000
Application received
25 Feb 2000
Application validated
20 Apr 2000
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Apr 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · Steve Isaacson

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.