Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasLewishamRushey Green wardDC/20/116254
Planning application · Lewisham

DC/20/116254.

FIRST FLOOR FLAT, 65 LALEHAM ROAD, LONDON, SE6 2HU

Full / Other Planning at FIRST FLOOR FLAT, 65 LALEHAM ROAD, LONDON, SE6 2HU, received 23 Mar 2020 — refused on 8 Jun 2020 (delegated, Amanda Ghani).

LewishamRushey GreenSE6 2HUDC/20/116254
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLewisham profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Jun 2020
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lewisham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a dormer roof extension on the rear roof slope of the first floor flat, 65 Laleham Road, SE6.

Reference
DC/20/116254
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE6 2HU
Council
Received
23 Mar 2020
Validated
31 Mar 2020
Target date
26 May 2020
Decision date
8 Jun 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
DC/20/116254
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE6 2HU
Council
Received
23 Mar 2020
Validated
31 Mar 2020
Target date
26 May 2020
Decision date
8 Jun 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPEAL DECISION
20 May 2021
APPEAL FORM
4 Feb 2021
APPEAL START LETTER
4 Feb 2021
APPEAL STATEMENT
4 Feb 2021
Decision Notice
8 Jun 2020
LLH65A/PR011 REV.A
22 May 2020
LLH65A/PR111 REV.A
22 May 2020
APPLICATION FORM
24 Mar 2020
BIRDS EYE VIEW
24 Mar 2020
PROPOSED DRAWINGS
24 Mar 2020
APPEAL DECISION
20 May 2021
APPEAL FORM
4 Feb 2021
APPEAL START LETTER
4 Feb 2021
Show all 10 rows
APPEAL STATEMENT
4 Feb 2021
Decision Notice
8 Jun 2020
LLH65A/PR011 REV.A
22 May 2020
LLH65A/PR111 REV.A
22 May 2020
APPLICATION FORM
24 Mar 2020
BIRDS EYE VIEW
24 Mar 2020
PROPOSED DRAWINGS
24 Mar 2020

Documents open on the Lewisham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 8 Jun 2020, delegated decision by Amanda Ghani — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Mar 2020
Application received
31 Mar 2020
Application validated
26 May 2020
Statutory target date
8 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Amanda Ghani
23 Mar 2020
Application received
31 Mar 2020
Application validated
26 May 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Amanda Ghani

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear roof extension due to its lack of set backs from the existing roof ridgeline and No. 63 Laleham Road in addition to its use of poor quality materials, would result in an insensitive and overly dominant addition to the rear roof slope that would fail to respect or complement the host building contrary to contrary to CS Policy 15 High Quality Design for Lewisham of the adopted Core Strategy (2011), DM Policy 30 Urban Design and Local Character and DM Policy 31 Alterations and Extensions to Existing Buildings including Residential Extensions of the Development Management Local Plan (2014) and The Alterations and Extensions SPD (2019).
1
The proposed rear roof extension due to its lack of set backs from the existing roof ridgeline and No. 63 Laleham Road in addition to its use of poor quality materials, would result in an insensitive and overly dominant addition to the rear roof slope that would fail to respect or complement the host building contrary to contrary to CS Policy 15 High Quality Design for Lewisham of the adopted Core Strategy (2011), DM Policy 30 Urban Design and Local Character and DM Policy 31 Alterations and Extensions to Existing Buildings including Residential Extensions of the Development Management Local Plan (2014) and The Alterations and Extensions SPD (2019).

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.