Record from the Lewisham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of a single storey rear in-fill extension at 29 BARMESTON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 3B, together with alteration to the fenestration of ground floor rear elevation.
Documents open on the Lewisham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 6 Aug 2021, delegated decision by Zahra Rad — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Jun 2021
Application received
11 Jun 2021
Application validated
6 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
6 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Zahra Rad
2 Jun 2021
Application received
11 Jun 2021
Application validated
6 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Zahra Rad
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed in-fill extension, by reason of excessive scale and height would appear
as an incongruous form of development failing to be appropriately subservient to the
host property, and would result in significant visual harm upon the character and
appearance of the host property, and surrounding area, contrary to paragraphs 126
and 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework (July 2021), Core Strategy Policy
15 'High quality design for Lewisham' of the Core Strategy (June 2011) and DM Policy
30 'Urban design and local character' and 31 'Alterations and extensions to existing
buildings including residential extensions' of the Development Management Local Plan
(November 2014), and the provisions of the Alterations and Extensions SPD (2019).
2
The proposed single storey in-fill extension, due to its excessive scale, would increase
sense of enclosure, loss of outlook, and would impact on sunlight and daylight,
resulting in material harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants at of No
27 Barmeston Road, contrary to Paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2021); Policy 15 High quality design for Lewisham, of the adopted Core
Strategy (June 2011), and DM 30 Urban design and local character and DM 31
Alterations/extensions to existing buildings of the Development Management Local
Plan (November 2014) and the provisions of The Alterations and Extensions SPD
(2019).
1
The proposed in-fill extension, by reason of excessive scale and height would appear
as an incongruous form of development failing to be appropriately subservient to the
host property, and would result in significant visual harm upon the character and
appearance of the host property, and surrounding area, contrary to paragraphs 126
and 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework (July 2021), Core Strategy Policy
15 'High quality design for Lewisham' of the Core Strategy (June 2011) and DM Policy
30 'Urban design and local character' and 31 'Alterations and extensions to existing
buildings including residential extensions' of the Development Management Local Plan
(November 2014), and the provisions of the Alterations and Extensions SPD (2019).
2
The proposed single storey in-fill extension, due to its excessive scale, would increase
sense of enclosure, loss of outlook, and would impact on sunlight and daylight,
resulting in material harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants at of No
27 Barmeston Road, contrary to Paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2021); Policy 15 High quality design for Lewisham, of the adopted Core
Strategy (June 2011), and DM 30 Urban design and local character and DM 31
Alterations/extensions to existing buildings of the Development Management Local
Plan (November 2014) and the provisions of The Alterations and Extensions SPD
(2019).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 126National Planning Policy Framework 130NPPF
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.