Planning application · Lewisham
DC/21/122992.
205 BARING ROAD, LONDON, SE12 0PX
Householder at 205 BARING ROAD, LONDON, SE12 0PX, received 6 Aug 2021 — refused on 1 Oct 2021 (delegated, Antigoni Gkiza).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLewisham profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Oct 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lewisham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of conservatory and construction of single storey extension at 205 BARING ROAD, SE12.
Reference
DC/21/122992
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE12 0PX
Ward
Council
Received
6 Aug 2021
Validated
9 Aug 2021
Target date
4 Oct 2021
Decision date
1 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
DC/21/122992
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE12 0PX
Ward
Council
Received
6 Aug 2021
Validated
9 Aug 2021
Target date
4 Oct 2021
Decision date
1 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Lewisham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 Oct 2021, delegated decision by Antigoni Gkiza — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Aug 2021
Application received
9 Aug 2021
Application validated
4 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
1 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Antigoni Gkiza
6 Aug 2021
Application received
9 Aug 2021
Application validated
4 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Antigoni Gkiza
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear extension due to its height, depth and siting would be a bulky and
disproportionate addition to the host property, and result in an unacceptable sense of
enclosure and harmful impact upon the amenity of the occupiers of Nos. 203 and 207
Baring Road, contrary to Policy 15 High quality design for Lewisham of the Lewisham
Core Strategy (June 2011), Policy 30 Urban design and local character and Policy 31
Alterations and extensions to existing buildings including residential extensions of the
Development Management Local Plan (November 2014), Policy BE1 of the Grove
Park Neighbourhood Development Plan, and the Alterations and Extensions
Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019).
1
The proposed rear extension due to its height, depth and siting would be a bulky and
disproportionate addition to the host property, and result in an unacceptable sense of
enclosure and harmful impact upon the amenity of the occupiers of Nos. 203 and 207
Baring Road, contrary to Policy 15 High quality design for Lewisham of the Lewisham
Core Strategy (June 2011), Policy 30 Urban design and local character and Policy 31
Alterations and extensions to existing buildings including residential extensions of the
Development Management Local Plan (November 2014), Policy BE1 of the Grove
Park Neighbourhood Development Plan, and the Alterations and Extensions
Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019).
Policies cited
BE1
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.