Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Lewisham›DC/21/123794
Planning application · Lewisham

DC/21/123794.

EARL PUMPING STATION, CHILTON GROVE, LONDON, SE8

Full / Other Planning at EARL PUMPING STATION, CHILTON GROVE, LONDON, SE8, received 6 Oct 2021 — approved on 6 Jan 2022 (delegated, Zahra Rad).

Lewisham›DC/21/123794
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationLewisham profile →
Approved
Outcome
6 Jan 2022
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Lewisham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Order 2014 formal application under EARPS11 (Street Trees) - Installation of Piezometer in Root Protection Area

Reference
DC/21/123794
Type
Thames Tunnel Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
6 Oct 2021
Target date
1 Dec 2021
Decision date
6 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
DC/21/123794
Type
Thames Tunnel Application
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
6 Oct 2021
Target date
1 Dec 2021
Decision date
6 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Lewisham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 6 Jan 2022, delegated decision by Zahra Rad — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Oct 2021
Application received
1 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
6 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Approved · Zahra Rad
6 Oct 2021
Application received
1 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
6 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Approved · Zahra Rad

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.