Ward · London Borough of Lewisham
New Cross Gate.
New Cross Gate sees an approval rate of 92% — 12 points above the Lewisham average across 454 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 8.4%.[1]
Lewisham454 applications
Postcodes (centres) shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
454
Applications 2016–26
Decided applications
92%
Approval rate
12pp above borough avg (80%)
8.4%
Refusal rate
Lowest in Lewisham
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Lewisham planning records and committee minutes, 2016–26.
Ward overview
New Cross Gate recorded 454 substantive planning decisions over 2016–26, approving 92% of them — 12 percentage points above the Lewisham borough average of 80%. Its refusal rate of 8.4% is lowest in lewisham.
Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.
Sources & method
- [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Lewisham planning register and published decision notices, 2016–26. · methodology
- [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
- [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
- [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.