Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Merton›…Pollards Hill - historic ward›00/P1687
Planning application · Merton

00/P1687.

88A Chestnut Grove, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 1RA

Full / Other Planning at 88A Chestnut Grove, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 1RA, received 4 Sep 2000 — withdrawn on 10 May 2001 (delegated, Historic Officer).

Merton›Pollards Hill - historic›CR4 1RA›00/P1687
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
10 May 2001
35 wks
Decision time
27 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

REDEVELOPEMENTINVOLVING THE ERECTION OF NO 2 X 3 BED, 2 STOREY HOUSES INCORPORATING ROOMS IN DORMER ROOF EXTENSIONS ( THE PROPOSAL INVOLVES DEMOLITION OF EXISTING GARAGES )

Reference
00/P1687
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR4 1RA
Ward
Council
Received
4 Sep 2000
Target date
30 Oct 2000
Decision date
10 May 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
00/P1687
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR4 1RA
Ward
Council
Received
4 Sep 2000
Target date
30 Oct 2000
Decision date
10 May 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 10 May 2001, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 35 weeks from submission (27 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Sep 2000
Application received
30 Oct 2000
Statutory target date
10 May 2001
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Historic Officer
4 Sep 2000
Application received
30 Oct 2000
Statutory target date
10 May 2001
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Historic Officer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.