Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Merton›…Pollards Hill - historic ward›04/P1644
Planning application · Merton

04/P1644.

67A Sherwood Park Road, Mitcham, Merton

Full / Other Planning at 67A Sherwood Park Road, Mitcham, Merton, received 26 Jul 2004 — refused on 15 Oct 2004 (delegated, Historic Officer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Oct 2004
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

ERECTION OF FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR EXTENSION TO FORM A TWO BED FLAT WITH DETACHED DOUBLE GARAGE AT REAR OF SITE.

Reference
04/P1644
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2004
Validated
24 Aug 2004
Target date
19 Oct 2004
Decision date
15 Oct 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
04/P1644
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2004
Validated
24 Aug 2004
Target date
19 Oct 2004
Decision date
15 Oct 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Oct 2004, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jul 2004
Application received
24 Aug 2004
Application validated
19 Oct 2004
Statutory target date
15 Oct 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
26 Jul 2004
Application received
24 Aug 2004
Application validated
19 Oct 2004
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
15 Oct 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.