Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasMertonVillage - historic ward16/P0309
Planning application · Merton

16/P0309.

6 Royal Close, Wimbledon, Merton, SW19 5RS

Full / Other Planning at 6 Royal Close, Wimbledon, Merton, SW19 5RS, received 18 Jan 2016 — approved on 29 Feb 2016 (delegated, Tim Lipscomb).

MertonVillage - historicSW19 5RS16/P0309
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Approved
Outcome
29 Feb 2016
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

DEMOLITION OF EXISTING CONSERVATORY AND THE PROPOSED ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION.

Reference
16/P0309
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW19 5RS
Council
Received
18 Jan 2016
Target date
14 Mar 2016
Decision date
29 Feb 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
16/P0309
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW19 5RS
Council
Received
18 Jan 2016
Target date
14 Mar 2016
Decision date
29 Feb 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Plans & Elevations.pdf
Delegated Report.PDF
Press Notice 04.02.16.pdf
Application Form NoPersonalData.pdf
Decision Notice.pdf
Plans & Elevations.pdf
Delegated Report.PDF
Press Notice 04.02.16.pdf
Show all 5 rows
Application Form NoPersonalData.pdf
Decision Notice.pdf

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 29 Feb 2016, delegated decision by Tim Lipscomb — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jan 2016
Application received
14 Mar 2016
Statutory target date
29 Feb 2016
Delegated decision: Approved · Tim Lipscomb
18 Jan 2016
Application received
14 Mar 2016
Statutory target date
29 Feb 2016
Delegated decision: Approved · Tim Lipscomb

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.