Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
ERECTION OF A TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION AND HIP TO GABLE AND REAR ROOF EXTENSIONS TO CONVERT THE PROPERTY INTO THREE x SELF CONTAINED FLATS.
Refused on 17 May 2021, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 32 weeks from submission (24 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Oct 2020
Application received
23 Oct 2020
Application validated
18 Dec 2020
Statutory target date
17 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
2 Oct 2020
Application received
23 Oct 2020
Application validated
18 Dec 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development due to its design, height, siting and massing would result in an
incongruous and inappropriate form of development that would be dominant and intrusive, failing to
complement the appearance of the existing building and neighbouring buildings. The proposal
would therefore be contrary to Merton Sites and Policies Plan 2014 policy DM D1, DM D2 and
DMD3, Core Strategy Policy CS 14 and London Plan policy D3 and D4.
2
The proposed development would fail to provide a good standard of living conditions for the future
occupants of the dwelling, given that the bedroom of Flat C would suffer from poor outlook.
Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to London Plan 2021 policy D6 and Merton SPP policies
DM D2.
3
The proposed development due to the position of external openings, as well as the height, depth
and siting of the first floor and loft extension, would result in a loss of privacy, block light, and create
an overbearing and unneighbourly presence to the detriment of neighbour's living conditions. The
proposal therefore fails to comply with policies DMD2 and DMD3 of the Merton Sites and Policies
Plan 2014, CS 14 of the LBM Core Strategy 2011 and D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
4
INFORMATIVE 1 - Note to Applicant
In accordance with paragraph 38 of the NPPF, The London Borough of Merton (LBM) takes a
1
The proposed development due to its design, height, siting and massing would result in an
incongruous and inappropriate form of development that would be dominant and intrusive, failing to
complement the appearance of the existing building and neighbouring buildings. The proposal
would therefore be contrary to Merton Sites and Policies Plan 2014 policy DM D1, DM D2 and
DMD3, Core Strategy Policy CS 14 and London Plan policy D3 and D4.
2
The proposed development would fail to provide a good standard of living conditions for the future
occupants of the dwelling, given that the bedroom of Flat C would suffer from poor outlook.
Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to London Plan 2021 policy D6 and Merton SPP policies
DM D2.
3
The proposed development due to the position of external openings, as well as the height, depth
and siting of the first floor and loft extension, would result in a loss of privacy, block light, and create
an overbearing and unneighbourly presence to the detriment of neighbour's living conditions. The
proposal therefore fails to comply with policies DMD2 and DMD3 of the Merton Sites and Policies
Plan 2014, CS 14 of the LBM Core Strategy 2011 and D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
Show all 4 rows
4
INFORMATIVE 1 - Note to Applicant
In accordance with paragraph 38 of the NPPF, The London Borough of Merton (LBM) takes a
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.