Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasMertonRaynes Park - historic ward22/P0481
Planning application · Merton

22/P0481.

133 Durham Road, Raynes Park, Merton, SW20 0DF

Full / Other Planning at 133 Durham Road, Raynes Park, Merton, SW20 0DF, received 19 Jan 2022 — refused on 21 Apr 2022 (delegated, Historic Officer).

MertonRaynes Park - historicSW20 0DF22/P0481
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Apr 2022
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

ERECTION OF TWO STOREY REAR INFILL EXTENSION TO BUILDING CORNER, EXTENSIONS OF THE ROOF, INCLUDING A REAR DORMER. INSTALLATION OF WINDOWS AND BIFOLD DOOR.

Reference
22/P0481
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW20 0DF
Council
Received
19 Jan 2022
Target date
16 Mar 2022
Decision date
21 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Under Appeal
Reference
22/P0481
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW20 0DF
Council
Received
19 Jan 2022
Target date
16 Mar 2022
Decision date
21 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Under Appeal
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Block Plan.pdf
CIL Form.pdf
Site Location Plan.pdf
Photo 02.jpg
Appeal Decision.pdf
Portal Email - 19.01.22.pdf
ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf
Plans & Elevations.pdf
Photo 04.jpg
Fire Safety Statement.pdf
Block Plan.pdf
CIL Form.pdf
Site Location Plan.pdf
Show all 10 rows
Photo 02.jpg
Appeal Decision.pdf
Portal Email - 19.01.22.pdf
ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf
Plans & Elevations.pdf
Photo 04.jpg
Fire Safety Statement.pdf

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 21 Apr 2022, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Jan 2022
Application received
16 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
19 Jan 2022
Application received
16 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed roof extensions with raised eaves, by virtue of their scale, bulk, profile and roof form, would constitute an obtrusive and incongruous form of development that would detract from the appearance of the original building and be out of keeping with, and detrimental to, the visual amenity and character of the area. Therefore, the proposals would be contrary to the principles of policies DMD2 and DMD3 of the Adopted SPP 2014, CS 14 of the LBM Core Strategy 2011 and D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
INFORMATIVE 1 - Note to Applicant In accordance with paragraph 38 of the NPPF, The London Borough of Merton (LBM) takes a
1
The proposed roof extensions with raised eaves, by virtue of their scale, bulk, profile and roof form, would constitute an obtrusive and incongruous form of development that would detract from the appearance of the original building and be out of keeping with, and detrimental to, the visual amenity and character of the area. Therefore, the proposals would be contrary to the principles of policies DMD2 and DMD3 of the Adopted SPP 2014, CS 14 of the LBM Core Strategy 2011 and D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
INFORMATIVE 1 - Note to Applicant In accordance with paragraph 38 of the NPPF, The London Borough of Merton (LBM) takes a
Policies cited
CS14D3D4NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.