Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Merton›…Phipps Bridge - historic wardCR4 4BE329 London Road, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 4BE›96/P0112
Planning application · Merton

96/P0112.

329 London Road, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 4BE

Full / Other Planning at 329 London Road, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 4BE, received 8 Feb 1996 — approved on 28 Mar 1996 by committee.

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Mar 1996
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

CHANGE OF USE OF FIRST FLOOR ACCOMMODATION TO PROVIDE 9 X TWO BEDROOM AND 1 X ONE BEDROOM FLATS.

Reference
96/P0112
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
8 Feb 1996
Validated
1 Jan 1996
Decision date
28 Mar 1996
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
96/P0112
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
8 Feb 1996
Validated
1 Jan 1996
Decision date
28 Mar 1996
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Mar 1996, determined by the planning committee — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Feb 1996
Application received
1 Jan 1996
Application validated
28 Mar 1996
Committee decision: Approved
8 Feb 1996
Application received
1 Jan 1996
Application validated
28 Mar 1996
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.