Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Merton›…Pollards Hill - historic ward›96/P0299
Planning application · Merton

96/P0299.

29 Vale Road, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 1NP

Full / Other Planning at 29 Vale Road, Mitcham, Surrey, Merton, CR4 1NP, received 22 Mar 1996 — refused on 18 Oct 1996 (delegated, Historic Officer).

Merton›Pollards Hill - historic›CR4 1NP›96/P0299
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Oct 1996
30 wks
Decision time
22 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

RETENTION OF SINGLE-STOREY REAR EXTENSION.

Reference
96/P0299
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR4 1NP
Ward
Council
Received
22 Mar 1996
Validated
1 Jan 1996
Decision date
18 Oct 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
96/P0299
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR4 1NP
Ward
Council
Received
22 Mar 1996
Validated
1 Jan 1996
Decision date
18 Oct 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 18 Oct 1996, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 30 weeks from submission (22 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Mar 1996
Application received
1 Jan 1996
Application validated
18 Oct 1996
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
22 Mar 1996
Application received
1 Jan 1996
Application validated
18 Oct 1996
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.