Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Merton›…Ravensbury - historic wardCR4 4SJFIELDWAY NURSING CENTRE, 40 Tramway Path, Mitcham, Merton, CR4 4SJ›97/P1417
Planning application · Merton

97/P1417.

FIELDWAY NURSING CENTRE, 40 Tramway Path, Mitcham, Merton, CR4 4SJ

Advertisement at FIELDWAY NURSING CENTRE, 40 Tramway Path, Mitcham, Merton, CR4 4SJ, received 3 Dec 1997 — approved on 25 Feb 1998 (delegated, Historic Officer).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationMerton profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Feb 1998
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Merton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

INSTALLATION OF FREESTANDING EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN.

Reference
97/P1417
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Dec 1997
Validated
1 Jan 1997
Decision date
25 Feb 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
97/P1417
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Dec 1997
Validated
1 Jan 1997
Decision date
25 Feb 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Merton portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 25 Feb 1998, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Dec 1997
Application received
1 Jan 1997
Application validated
25 Feb 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Historic Officer
3 Dec 1997
Application received
1 Jan 1997
Application validated
25 Feb 1998
Delegated decision: Approved · Historic Officer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.