Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Newham›…Wall End wardE6 2AH›05/0087
Planning application · Newham

05/0087.

39 Springfield Road, East Ham London, E6 2ah

Full / Other Planning at 39 Springfield Road, East Ham London, E6 2ah — refused on 24 Mar 2005 (delegated, Simon Marks).

Newham›Wall End›E6 2AH›05/0087
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Mar 2005
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion Of A Single Dwelling Into Two Self Contained Flats.

Reference
05/0087
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
7 Feb 2005
Decision date
24 Mar 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
05/0087
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
7 Feb 2005
Decision date
24 Mar 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
6 May 2009
Drawing
6 May 2009
Documentation
6 May 2009
Documentation
6 May 2009
Decision Notice
6 May 2009
Application Form
6 May 2009
Drawing
6 May 2009
Documentation
6 May 2009
Show all 5 rows
Documentation
6 May 2009
Decision Notice
6 May 2009

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Mar 2005, delegated decision by Simon Marks.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Feb 2005
Application validated
24 Mar 2005
Delegated decision: Refused · Simon Marks
7 Feb 2005
Application validated
24 Mar 2005
Delegated decision: Refused · Simon Marks

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.