Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamBoleyn wardE6 1PW10/00761/LBC
Planning application · Newham

10/00761/LBC.

Boleyn Tavern 1 Barking Road East Ham London E6 1PW

Listed Building at Boleyn Tavern 1 Barking Road East Ham London E6 1PW — refused on 27 May 2010 (delegated, Dave Walker).

NewhamBoleynE6 1PW10/00761/LBC
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 May 2010
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Display of a non-illuminated advertisement horading on the rear elevation.

Reference
10/00761/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
Validated
7 Apr 2010
Target date
12 May 2010
Decision date
27 May 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
10/00761/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
Validated
7 Apr 2010
Target date
12 May 2010
Decision date
27 May 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
1 Jun 2010
Officers report
1 Jun 2010
Site notice erected 22/4/2010
22 Apr 2010
Application Form
19 Apr 2010
Heritage Statement
19 Apr 2010
Decision Notice
1 Jun 2010
Officers report
1 Jun 2010
Site notice erected 22/4/2010
22 Apr 2010
Show all 5 rows
Application Form
19 Apr 2010
Heritage Statement
19 Apr 2010

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 May 2010, delegated decision by Dave Walker.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Apr 2010
Application validated
12 May 2010
Statutory target date
27 May 2010
Delegated decision: Refused · Dave Walker
7 Apr 2010
Application validated
12 May 2010
Statutory target date
27 May 2010
Delegated decision: Refused · Dave Walker

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.