Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamBeckton ward10/01508/LTGDC
Planning application · Newham

10/01508/LTGDC.

Hollywood Bowl Jenkins Lane East Ham London IG11 0AD

Full / Other Planning at Hollywood Bowl Jenkins Lane East Ham London IG11 0AD — withdrawn on 21 Dec 2011 by committee.

NewhamBecktonIG11 0AD10/01508/LTGDC
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
21 Dec 2011
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective change of use from Bowling Alley (D2) to: Conference Centre, Computer Training Centre, Place of Worship and Day Care Centre (D1), Concert Hall, Dance Hall and Banquet Hall (D2), Restaurant and Caf� (A3) and Administration Offices (B1)

Reference
10/01508/LTGDC
Type
London Thames Gateway Development Corp
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 0AD
Council
Received
Validated
20 Sep 2010
Target date
18 Mar 2011
Decision date
21 Dec 2011
Decision route
Planning committee
Reference
10/01508/LTGDC
Type
London Thames Gateway Development Corp
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 0AD
Council
Received
Validated
20 Sep 2010
Target date
18 Mar 2011
Decision date
21 Dec 2011
Decision route
Planning committee
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 21 Dec 2011, determined by the planning committee.

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Sep 2010
Application validated
18 Mar 2011
Statutory target date
21 Dec 2011
Committee decision: Withdrawn
20 Sep 2010
Application validated
18 Mar 2011
Statutory target date
21 Dec 2011
Committee decision: Withdrawn

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.