Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Newham›…Boleyn wardE6 1EX77 Victoria Avenue East Ham London E6 1EX›16/00130/CLE
Planning application · Newham

16/00130/CLE.

77 Victoria Avenue East Ham London E6 1EX

Lawful Development Certificate at 77 Victoria Avenue East Ham London E6 1EX — approved on 5 Apr 2016.

Newham›Boleyn›E6 1EX›16/00130/CLE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Apr 2016
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of lawfulness for the existing single storey side kitchen extension.

Reference
16/00130/CLE
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness Existing Use
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
18 Feb 2016
Target date
28 Apr 2016
Decision date
5 Apr 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Premises record
Council register
Reference
16/00130/CLE
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness Existing Use
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
18 Feb 2016
Target date
28 Apr 2016
Decision date
5 Apr 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Apr 2016.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Feb 2016
Application validated
28 Apr 2016
Statutory target date
5 Apr 2016
Delegated decision: Approved
18 Feb 2016
Application validated
28 Apr 2016
Statutory target date
5 Apr 2016
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.