Planning application · Newham
21/03076/PREA.
Holly Court 28 St Andrews Road Plaistow London E13 8QD
Other at Holly Court 28 St Andrews Road Plaistow London E13 8QD — refused on 18 Feb 2022.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Feb 2022
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Application for prior approval of a proposed two storey extension comprising of 5 self-contained apartments.
Reference
21/03076/PREA
Type
New dwellinghse on detached block flats
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
21 Dec 2021
Target date
1 Feb 2022
Decision date
18 Feb 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Premises record
Council register
Reference
21/03076/PREA
Type
New dwellinghse on detached block flats
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
21 Dec 2021
Target date
1 Feb 2022
Decision date
18 Feb 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Feb 2022.
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Dec 2021
Application validated
1 Feb 2022
Statutory target date
18 Feb 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
21 Dec 2021
Application validated
1 Feb 2022
Statutory target date
18 Feb 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development does not comply with the conditions, limitations or restrictions
applicable to development permitted by Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
Specifically, the proposal has not been submitted with a proposed cross-section drawing.
Officers are therefore not able to heck compliance with Class A.1 (e). Additionally, the
development site is located within 3km of the perimeter of London City Airport. Therefore, the
proposal would not comply with class A.1 (o)(vii).
Consequently, the proposed development falls outside of the scope of what can constitute
permitted development under Class A.
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's
website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
The proposed development does not comply with the conditions, limitations or restrictions
applicable to development permitted by Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
Specifically, the proposal has not been submitted with a proposed cross-section drawing.
Officers are therefore not able to heck compliance with Class A.1 (e). Additionally, the
development site is located within 3km of the perimeter of London City Airport. Therefore, the
proposal would not comply with class A.1 (o)(vii).
Consequently, the proposed development falls outside of the scope of what can constitute
permitted development under Class A.
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's
website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.