Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamCustom House ward22/01321/HH
Planning application · Newham

22/01321/HH.

6 Jasper Road West Beckton London Newham E16 3TR

Householder at 6 Jasper Road West Beckton London Newham E16 3TR — refused on 24 Aug 2022.

NewhamCustom HouseE16 3TR22/01321/HH
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Aug 2022
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a single storey rear extension and rear and front dormer extensions (amended description).

Reference
22/01321/HH
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
E16 3TR
Council
Received
Validated
10 Jun 2022
Decision date
24 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
22/01321/HH
Type
Householder Application
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
E16 3TR
Council
Received
Validated
10 Jun 2022
Decision date
24 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
24 Aug 2022
DECISION NOTICE
24 Aug 2022
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
10 Jun 2022
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
1 Jun 2022
SITE LOCATION PLAN
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
1 Jun 2022
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTION
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS
1 Jun 2022
BLOCK PLAN
1 Jun 2022
DELEGATED REPORT
24 Aug 2022
DECISION NOTICE
24 Aug 2022
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
10 Jun 2022
Show all 10 rows
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
1 Jun 2022
SITE LOCATION PLAN
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
1 Jun 2022
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTION
1 Jun 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS
1 Jun 2022
BLOCK PLAN
1 Jun 2022

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Aug 2022.

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jun 2022
Application validated
24 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
10 Jun 2022
Application validated
24 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer extension by virtue of its mass, bulk and incongruous design, constitutes an unsympathetic and disproportionate addition that fail to respect the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding locality and would appear overly dominant from the public realm. The proposal is therefore contrary to:  The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, 2021);  Policies D1, D3, D4 and D8 of the London Plan (GLA, 2021); and,  Policies S1, S5, SP1, SP3 and SP8 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (2018). The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
The proposed rear dormer extension by virtue of its mass, bulk and incongruous design, constitutes an unsympathetic and disproportionate addition that fail to respect the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding locality and would appear overly dominant from the public realm. The proposal is therefore contrary to:  The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, 2021);  Policies D1, D3, D4 and D8 of the London Plan (GLA, 2021); and,  Policies S1, S5, SP1, SP3 and SP8 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (2018). The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
D1D3D4D8S1S5SP1SP3SP8NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.