Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamForest Gate South ward22/01679/HH
Planning application · Newham

22/01679/HH.

7 Earlham Grove Forest Gate London Newham E7 9AL

Householder at 7 Earlham Grove Forest Gate London Newham E7 9AL — refused on 31 Aug 2022 (delegated, Daniel Woodford).

NewhamForest Gate SouthE7 9AL22/01679/HH
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Aug 2022
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed basement excavation and extension to include an office, gym and a kitchen with bathroom, proposed staircase and lightwell, floor plan redesign and all associated works at 7 Earlham Grove.

Reference
22/01679/HH
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E7 9AL
Council
Received
Validated
11 Jul 2022
Target date
18 Aug 2022
Decision date
31 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
22/01679/HH
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E7 9AL
Council
Received
Validated
11 Jul 2022
Target date
18 Aug 2022
Decision date
31 Aug 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
31 Aug 2022
DECISION NOTICE
31 Aug 2022
NETWORK RAIL
24 Aug 2022
CROSSRAIL
1 Aug 2022
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
11 Jul 2022
BLOCK PLAN
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING PLANS
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING SECTION
11 Jul 2022
PROPOSED PLANS
11 Jul 2022
DELEGATED REPORT
31 Aug 2022
DECISION NOTICE
31 Aug 2022
NETWORK RAIL
24 Aug 2022
Show all 10 rows
CROSSRAIL
1 Aug 2022
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
11 Jul 2022
BLOCK PLAN
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING PLANS
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
11 Jul 2022
EXISTING SECTION
11 Jul 2022
PROPOSED PLANS
11 Jul 2022

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 31 Aug 2022, delegated decision by Daniel Woodford.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Jul 2022
Application validated
18 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
31 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Daniel Woodford
11 Jul 2022
Application validated
18 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
31 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Daniel Woodford

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by virtue of its poor quality internal design and layout, would result in unacceptable living conditions, giving rise to cramped internal habitable spaces, with a lack of suitable ventilation for the internal arrangement proposed. This is contrary to; - The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, Feb 2019); - Policies D3 and D4 of The London Plan (GLA, March 2021); - Policies S1, S6, SP1 and SP3 of The London Borough of Newham Local Plan 2018; and - The Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (adopted 01 February 2018) The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
The proposed development, by virtue of its poor quality internal design and layout, would result in unacceptable living conditions, giving rise to cramped internal habitable spaces, with a lack of suitable ventilation for the internal arrangement proposed. This is contrary to; - The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, Feb 2019); - Policies D3 and D4 of The London Plan (GLA, March 2021); - Policies S1, S6, SP1 and SP3 of The London Borough of Newham Local Plan 2018; and - The Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (adopted 01 February 2018) The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
D3D4S1S6SP1SP3NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.