Planning application · Newham
24/01856/FUL.
271 Prince Regent Lane Plaistow London E13 8SD
Full / Other Planning at 271 Prince Regent Lane Plaistow London E13 8SD — refused on 1 May 2025 (delegated, Sumeen Kaur Baweja).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 May 2025
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of a canopy to the front elevation.
Reference
24/01856/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E13 8SD
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
23 Sep 2024
Target date
5 Nov 2024
Decision date
1 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
24/01856/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E13 8SD
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
23 Sep 2024
Target date
5 Nov 2024
Decision date
1 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 May 2025, delegated decision by Sumeen Kaur Baweja.
Timeline
Date
Event
23 Sep 2024
Application validated
5 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
1 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Sumeen Kaur Baweja
23 Sep 2024
Application validated
5 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
1 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Sumeen Kaur Baweja
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reason 1
The proposed development would result in the intensification of a town centre use outside of a
designated local or town centre. This is considered to harm the vitality and vibrancy of the Borough’s
existing local and town centres. The proposal is therefore contrary to:
National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);
Policies SP1, SP6 and INF5 of London Borough of Newham’s Local Plan (December 2018).
2
Reason 2
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive bulk and scale and ill-fitting design, is
considered to result in undue harm to the character and appearance of the original building,
surrounding context and public realm. The proposal is therefore contrary to:
National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);
Policies D3 and D8 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021);
Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December 2018).
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's
website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
Reason 1
The proposed development would result in the intensification of a town centre use outside of a
designated local or town centre. This is considered to harm the vitality and vibrancy of the Borough’s
existing local and town centres. The proposal is therefore contrary to:
National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);
Policies SP1, SP6 and INF5 of London Borough of Newham’s Local Plan (December 2018).
2
Reason 2
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive bulk and scale and ill-fitting design, is
considered to result in undue harm to the character and appearance of the original building,
surrounding context and public realm. The proposal is therefore contrary to:
National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);
Policies D3 and D8 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021);
Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December 2018).
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's
website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
SP1SP6INF5NPPFD3D8SP3
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.