Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamGreen Street East wardE7 8HE145 South Esk Road Forest Gate London E7 8HE25/02781/HH
Planning application · Newham

25/02781/HH.

145 South Esk Road Forest Gate London E7 8HE

Householder at 145 South Esk Road Forest Gate London E7 8HE — refused on 9 Apr 2026 (delegated, Zamzam Mohamoud).

NewhamGreen Street EastE7 8HE25/02781/HH
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Apr 2026
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of ground floor rear extension and alteration to the front porch.

Reference
25/02781/HH
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
Validated
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
9 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
25/02781/HH
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
Validated
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
9 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
9 Apr 2026
DECISION NOTICE
2 Apr 2026
REVISED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
1 Apr 2026
PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
29 Mar 2026
REVISED SUNTUBE
29 Mar 2026
ROUGH SKETCH OF SUNTUBE TUNNEL
29 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
8 Dec 2025
EXISTING PLAN & ELEVATIONS
8 Dec 2025
PROPOSED PLANS & ELEVATIONS
8 Dec 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED SECTION
8 Dec 2025
DELEGATED REPORT
9 Apr 2026
DECISION NOTICE
2 Apr 2026
REVISED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
1 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
29 Mar 2026
REVISED SUNTUBE
29 Mar 2026
ROUGH SKETCH OF SUNTUBE TUNNEL
29 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
8 Dec 2025
EXISTING PLAN & ELEVATIONS
8 Dec 2025
PROPOSED PLANS & ELEVATIONS
8 Dec 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED SECTION
8 Dec 2025

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 9 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Zamzam Mohamoud.

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Dec 2025
Application validated
9 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Zamzam Mohamoud
8 Dec 2025
Application validated
9 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Zamzam Mohamoud

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reason 1 The proposed single-storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth and cumulative impact when combined with the existing outbuilding, would result in the overdevelopment of the plot and the erosion of meaningful rear garden openness. The scale and bulk of the extension would appear visually dominant and would fail to respect the established pattern of modest rear projections along the terrace, causing harm to the character of the host property and wider area.
2
Reason 2 The proposed front porch would require the removal or concealment of original architectural detailing to the front door, a feature specifically identified as contributing to the character and rhythm of the terrace. The resulting alteration would disrupt the traditional set-back entrance arrangement and introduce an incongruous addition to the frontage, causing harm to the architectural integrity of the dwelling and the wider streetscene. The proposal is therefore contrary to:  The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);  Policy D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021);  Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December 2018); and  Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (LBN, February 2018) The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
Reason 1 The proposed single-storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth and cumulative impact when combined with the existing outbuilding, would result in the overdevelopment of the plot and the erosion of meaningful rear garden openness. The scale and bulk of the extension would appear visually dominant and would fail to respect the established pattern of modest rear projections along the terrace, causing harm to the character of the host property and wider area.
2
Reason 2 The proposed front porch would require the removal or concealment of original architectural detailing to the front door, a feature specifically identified as contributing to the character and rhythm of the terrace. The resulting alteration would disrupt the traditional set-back entrance arrangement and introduce an incongruous addition to the frontage, causing harm to the architectural integrity of the dwelling and the wider streetscene. The proposal is therefore contrary to:  The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024);  Policy D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021);  Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December 2018); and  Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (LBN, February 2018) The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
D4SP1SP3NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.