Planning application · Newham
26/00203/HH.
96 Hampton Road Forest Gate London E7 0NU
Householder at 96 Hampton Road Forest Gate London E7 0NU — refused on 30 Mar 2026 (delegated, Muniba Tariq).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Mar 2026
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
27
Documents
27 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of rear ground floor extension; 3x roof lights to the rear roof pitch of main house; Alterations to the front garden and front boundary wall. (This application is in the Woodgrange Estate Conservation area)
Reference
26/00203/HH
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E7 0NU
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
28 Feb 2026
Decision date
30 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
26/00203/HH
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E7 0NU
Council
Received
—
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
28 Feb 2026
Decision date
30 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Muniba Tariq.
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
28 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Muniba Tariq
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
28 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Muniba Tariq
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Delivering High Quality Design
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by virtue of its excessive depth, width and overall
scale and bulk fails to appear subservient to the host building nor respect or enhance the
character and appearance of the Woogrange Conservation Area. Furthermore, the proposals
involve harmful alterations to the front of the property including an excessive extent of hard
landscaping, as well as a front boundary treatment that promotes off street parking where no
drop kerb exists. The proposed development exceeds and is contrary to the guidelines laid
out in the Woodgrange Conservation Area Design Guide (2022) exacerbating its
unacceptable scale and bulk, and poor detailed design, resulting in less than substantial
harm to the appearance and character of the Conservation Area without any demonstrable
public benefits. The proposal is therefore contrary to.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policies D1, D4, and HC1 of the London PlanThe London Plan (GLA, March 2021;
and);
• Policies SP1, SP3 and SP5 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan
(December 2018); and
• Woodgrange Conservation Area Design Guide (2002); and
• Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (Adopted 01 February 2018)
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the
Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the
www.gov.uk website.
1
Delivering High Quality Design
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by virtue of its excessive depth, width and overall
scale and bulk fails to appear subservient to the host building nor respect or enhance the
character and appearance of the Woogrange Conservation Area. Furthermore, the proposals
involve harmful alterations to the front of the property including an excessive extent of hard
landscaping, as well as a front boundary treatment that promotes off street parking where no
drop kerb exists. The proposed development exceeds and is contrary to the guidelines laid
out in the Woodgrange Conservation Area Design Guide (2022) exacerbating its
unacceptable scale and bulk, and poor detailed design, resulting in less than substantial
harm to the appearance and character of the Conservation Area without any demonstrable
public benefits. The proposal is therefore contrary to.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policies D1, D4, and HC1 of the London PlanThe London Plan (GLA, March 2021;
and);
• Policies SP1, SP3 and SP5 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan
(December 2018); and
• Woodgrange Conservation Area Design Guide (2002); and
• Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (Adopted 01 February 2018)
The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the
Council's website www.newham.gov.uk the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the
www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
HC1SP1SP3SP5NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.