Planning application · Newham
26/00403/HH.
18 Randolph Approach West Beckton London E16 3HU
Householder at 18 Randolph Approach West Beckton London E16 3HU — refused on 16 Apr 2026 (delegated, Muniba Tariq).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Apr 2026
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Removal of existing storage sheds and erection of two storey side extension.
Reference
26/00403/HH
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E16 3HU
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
20 Feb 2026
Target date
23 Mar 2026
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
26/00403/HH
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E16 3HU
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
20 Feb 2026
Target date
23 Mar 2026
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Muniba Tariq.
Timeline
Date
Event
20 Feb 2026
Application validated
23 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
16 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Muniba Tariq
20 Feb 2026
Application validated
23 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
16 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Muniba Tariq
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Achieving High Quality Design
The proposed two-storey side extension, by reason of its scale, width, depth and siting within
the side and rear garden, would result in a dominant and unsympathetic form of
development. The proposal would significantly reduce openness and would fail to respect the
established pattern of development in the surrounding area. It would appear as a prominent
and visually intrusive addition when viewed from Randolph Approach and King George
Avenue.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policy D3 and D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021); and
• Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December
2018); and
• Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (Adopted 01 February 2018).
2
Delivering Neighbourhood Amenity:
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing and proximity to No. 08
Randolph Approach, would result in an increased sense of enclosure and a reduction in
outlook and potential daylight/sunlight to neighbouring habitable rooms. The development
would have a dominant presence that would adversely affect the living conditions of
neighbouring occupiers.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021); and
• Policies SP1, SP2 and SP8 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan
(December 2018).
1
Achieving High Quality Design
The proposed two-storey side extension, by reason of its scale, width, depth and siting within
the side and rear garden, would result in a dominant and unsympathetic form of
development. The proposal would significantly reduce openness and would fail to respect the
established pattern of development in the surrounding area. It would appear as a prominent
and visually intrusive addition when viewed from Randolph Approach and King George
Avenue.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policy D3 and D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021); and
• Policies SP1 and SP3 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan (December
2018); and
• Altering and Extending Your Home SPD (Adopted 01 February 2018).
2
Delivering Neighbourhood Amenity:
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing and proximity to No. 08
Randolph Approach, would result in an increased sense of enclosure and a reduction in
outlook and potential daylight/sunlight to neighbouring habitable rooms. The development
would have a dominant presence that would adversely affect the living conditions of
neighbouring occupiers.
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, December 2024); and
• Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (GLA, March 2021); and
• Policies SP1, SP2 and SP8 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan
(December 2018).
Policies cited
D3D4SP1SP3NPPFSP2SP8
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.