Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasNewhamWall End ward26/00419/FUL
Planning application · Newham

26/00419/FUL.

115 Altmore Avenue East Ham London E6 2BX

Full / Other Planning at 115 Altmore Avenue East Ham London E6 2BX — refused on 29 Apr 2026 (delegated, Chloe Selwood).

NewhamWall EndE6 2BX26/00419/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationNewham profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Apr 2026
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Newham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of the existing temporary timber extension and replace with a single storey ground floor front extension to shop.

Reference
26/00419/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E6 2BX
Council
Received
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
26/00419/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E6 2BX
Council
Received
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
29 Apr 2026
DELEGATED REPORT
29 Apr 2026
SITE NOTICE
11 Mar 2026
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
4 Mar 2026
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
4 Mar 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
4 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
23 Feb 2026
LOCATION MAP
23 Feb 2026
COMBINED ELEVATION
23 Feb 2026
CIL FORM
23 Feb 2026
DECISION NOTICE
29 Apr 2026
DELEGATED REPORT
29 Apr 2026
SITE NOTICE
11 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
4 Mar 2026
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
4 Mar 2026
PLANNING STATEMENT
4 Mar 2026
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
23 Feb 2026
LOCATION MAP
23 Feb 2026
COMBINED ELEVATION
23 Feb 2026
CIL FORM
23 Feb 2026

Documents open on the Newham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Chloe Selwood.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Mar 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Chloe Selwood
4 Mar 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Chloe Selwood

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension and alteration to the existing commercial shopfront would be contrary to the Council's objectives of consolidating expansion of commercial uses to within the identified Town and Local Centres. This would result in a detraction of investment from these identified Centre areas, limiting the financial vitality and viability of these areas. Therefore, this proposal is contrary to: • The National Planning Policy Framework (2024); • Policies SD6 and E9 of the London Plan (2021); and • Policies S1, S2, SP6, SP7, J1 and INF5 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan.
2
The proposed extension, by virtue of its positioning and alteration to the existing design, would result in a form of development which fails to assimilate with the existing building line on Altmore Avenue. The extension would result in an anomalous design that would fail to present cohesion between the neighbouring residential use and the application site’s commercial use, including the removal of the existing chamfered elevation, which is more prominent due to the end-of-terrace location. The proposed design would appear piecemeal in nature, and would fail to assimilate with the established local character. Therefore, this proposal is contrary to: • The National Planning Policy Framework; • Policies D1 and D4 of The London Plan (2021); and • Policies S2, SP1, SP3 and SP8 of The London Borough of Newham Local Plan (2018). The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
1
The proposed extension and alteration to the existing commercial shopfront would be contrary to the Council's objectives of consolidating expansion of commercial uses to within the identified Town and Local Centres. This would result in a detraction of investment from these identified Centre areas, limiting the financial vitality and viability of these areas. Therefore, this proposal is contrary to: • The National Planning Policy Framework (2024); • Policies SD6 and E9 of the London Plan (2021); and • Policies S1, S2, SP6, SP7, J1 and INF5 of the London Borough of Newham Local Plan.
2
The proposed extension, by virtue of its positioning and alteration to the existing design, would result in a form of development which fails to assimilate with the existing building line on Altmore Avenue. The extension would result in an anomalous design that would fail to present cohesion between the neighbouring residential use and the application site’s commercial use, including the removal of the existing chamfered elevation, which is more prominent due to the end-of-terrace location. The proposed design would appear piecemeal in nature, and would fail to assimilate with the established local character. Therefore, this proposal is contrary to: • The National Planning Policy Framework; • Policies D1 and D4 of The London Plan (2021); and • Policies S2, SP1, SP3 and SP8 of The London Borough of Newham Local Plan (2018). The above policies can be viewed online via the respective government websites ie. the Council's website www.newham.gov.uk , the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk and the www.gov.uk website.
Policies cited
SD6E9S1S2SP6SP7J1INF5NPPFD1D4SP1SP3SP8

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.