Postcode record · Kingston Upon Thames
KT2 5UE.
KT2 5UE has 40 known premises and 4 planning records — 3 approved of 4 decided (75%). 32 EPC records.
Postcode KT2 5UE · boundary not held, centred on the postcodeApprovedRefusedOther4 exact4 on the map — every match
At a glance · this postcodeKingston Upon Thames profile →
40
Premises
known addresses (UPRNs)
4
Applications
4 decided
75%
Approval rate
3 approved · 0 refused
32
EPC records
ratings C 6 · D 26
4
Mapped applications
inside the postcode shape
Postcode unit boundary from Ordnance Survey; premises and applications inside it. Aggregates describe the area, not any single premises.
Property
What is it?
KT2 5UE has 40 known premises and 4 planning records — 3 approved of 4 decided (75%). 32 EPC records.
Premises (18 of 40 shown)
Name
Details
UPRN 128056486
UPRN 128056487
UPRN 128056488
UPRN 128056489
UPRN 128056490
UPRN 128056491
UPRN 128056492
UPRN 100023058227
UPRN 100023058228
UPRN 100023058229
UPRN 128056486
UPRN 128056487
UPRN 128056488
Show all 10 rows
UPRN 128056489
UPRN 128056490
UPRN 128056491
UPRN 128056492
UPRN 100023058227
UPRN 100023058228
UPRN 100023058229
Planning
What happened?
4 planning applications across the postcode; 3 approved of 4 decided (75%). Latest 4 shown.
Reference
Proposal · address
Type
Outcome
Date · distance
T4 Cherry: Fell to ground level and grind out the stump On the map provided online this tree is listed as Norway Maple when they are actually Cherry tree. Reasons for felling are in the arb report, Client has a replanting scheme also. Back in June I was a decision letter with 1 of the tree's proposed fell being accepted and 1 of the tree's proposed works being refused. An Arb report by the insurance company was provided with all necessary details and survey however the decision only relates to the amenity of the tree and not the effect the tree is having on the property as raised on the report. I have gone back to the site and collected even further evidence with pictures for your reference. my client the MOD has a responsibility for their trees to not affect non MOD properties which this tree is. please can the subsidence/health and safety of others being took into account instead of the amenity this tree provides.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Tree Preservation Order
Approved
2026-03-09
T2: Tree Tag 180 - Cherry - Fell.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Tree works
Withdrawn
2025-11-17
T85: Norway Maple - Crown lift up to 3m from ground level, T74: Cherry - Cutback to 2m clearance from house numbers 138 and 139, T98: Cherry - Cutback to 2m clearance from house number 147, T95: Norway Maple - Crown lift up to 3m from ground level and cutback away from the lamppost #25 to provide 2m clearance, T58: Norway Maple - Reduce the lowest large limb by up to 3m that is ascending in the direction of house number 158, T59: Beech - Install cobra bracing between the 3 main stems, T56: Red Oak - Cutback away from the lamppost #19 situated on Kings Road to provide 2m clearance.
145 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Tree Preservation Order
Approved
2025-08-13
T1: Tree Tag 177 - Cherry - Fell. T2: Tree Tag 180 - Cherry - Fell.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Tree Preservation Order
Approved
2025-04-17
T4 Cherry: Fell to ground level and grind out the stump On the map provided online this tree is listed as Norway Maple when they are actually Cherry tree. Reasons for felling are in the arb report, Client has a replanting scheme also. Back in June I was a decision letter with 1 of the tree's proposed fell being accepted and 1 of the tree's proposed works being refused. An Arb report by the insurance company was provided with all necessary details and survey however the decision only relates to the amenity of the tree and not the effect the tree is having on the property as raised on the report. I have gone back to the site and collected even further evidence with pictures for your reference. my client the MOD has a responsibility for their trees to not affect non MOD properties which this tree is. please can the subsidence/health and safety of others being took into account instead of the amenity this tree provides.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Approved
2026-03-09
More
Tree Preservation Order
T2: Tree Tag 180 - Cherry - Fell.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Withdrawn
2025-11-17
More
Tree works
T85: Norway Maple - Crown lift up to 3m from ground level, T74: Cherry - Cutback to 2m clearance from house numbers 138 and 139, T98: Cherry - Cutback to 2m clearance from house number 147, T95: Norway Maple - Crown lift up to 3m from ground level and cutback away from the lamppost #25 to provide 2m clearance, T58: Norway Maple - Reduce the lowest large limb by up to 3m that is ascending in the direction of house number 158, T59: Beech - Install cobra bracing between the 3 main stems, T56: Red Oak - Cutback away from the lamppost #19 situated on Kings Road to provide 2m clearance.
145 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Approved
2025-08-13
More
Tree Preservation Order
Show all 4 rows
T1: Tree Tag 177 - Cherry - Fell. T2: Tree Tag 180 - Cherry - Fell.
134 The Keep Kingston Upon Thames KT2 5UE · premises record
Approved
2025-04-17
More
Tree Preservation Order
Building control
Building-control records are not yet collected for Kingston Upon Thames — the register is being gathered borough by borough (held so far: Lambeth, Brent, Ealing, Westminster, City and others).
Place
What affects it?
No mapped designation intersects a premises point in this postcode in the current build. Open any premises above for its own designation record.
Nearby postcodes and streets
Walk to the next area — linked where the Atlas has a record for it (pilot borough only for now).
Footpath From Latchmere Road To The Keep0 mThe Keep0 mFootpath From 141 To 147 The Keep2 mFootpath From 46 To 58 The Keep8 mFootpath From 126 To 131 The Keep11 mAccess Road To Beauchamp Villas17 mFootpath From 134 To 138 The Keep17 mFootpath From 152 To 159 The Keep23 mFootpath From 168 To 187 And 199 The Keep33 mDinton Road47 m
People
Who is involved?
Named on the latest 4 applications in this postcode — the party who applied, not the owner or occupier.
Name
Details
Applicant on 3 applications
Agent on 2 applications
Agent on 1 application
Case officer on 3 applications
Applicant on 3 applications
Agent on 2 applications
Agent on 1 application
Show all 4 rows
Case officer on 3 applications
Development
What could it become?
Planning precedent4 applications and 4 mapped decisions in this postcode — precedent for what has been permitted and refused here.
Energy32 EPC records; ratings C: 6, D: 26.
What is not assertedNo capacity, value or ownership claim is made at area level; those belong to individual premises records and their evidence.
Intent signals
Planning Atlas ProOwnership, finance and market signals recorded at addresses in this postcode — each with date and source. Signals are evidence of change, not a prediction.
No intent signal is currently recorded in this postcode.
Boundary: OS Postcode Unit areas (Ordnance Survey), 2026-08-14. Planning records: canonical stage2. EPC: EPC register. Premises: OS AddressBase / UPRN.