Planning Atlas
AtlasPostcodeSW147DZ
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesEast Sheen wardSW14 7DZ
Postcode record · Richmond Upon Thames

SW14 7DZ.

SW14 7DZ has 41 known premises and 86 planning records — 62 approved of 85 decided (72.9%). 28 EPC records.

Postcode SW14 7DZ · boundary not held, centred on the postcodeApprovedRefusedOther86 exact86 on the map — every match
At a glance · this postcodeRichmond Upon Thames profile →
41
Premises
known addresses (UPRNs)
86
Applications
85 decided
72.9%
Approval rate
62 approved · 15 refused
28
EPC records
ratings C 13 · D 14 · E 1
86
Mapped applications
inside the postcode shape
Postcode unit boundary from Ordnance Survey; premises and applications inside it. Aggregates describe the area, not any single premises.
Property

What is it?

SW14 7DZ has 41 known premises and 86 planning records — 62 approved of 85 decided (72.9%). 28 EPC records.

Premises (18 of 41 shown)

Planning

What happened?

86 planning applications across the postcode; 62 approved of 85 decided (72.9%). Latest 30 shown.

Reference
Proposal · address
Type
Outcome
Date · distance
Single storey rear extension (6.00m depth, 3.00m eaves height, 3.50m maximum height).
42 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Officer Kreena Patel
General Permitted Development Extension
Approved
2025-04-14
Single storey rear extension, 6m in depth, 3.5m in height and 3m in height to eaves.
42 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
General Permitted Development Extension
Refused
2025-02-28
T1 Quercus palustris (Pin Oak): Fell to Ground Level This submission outlines the technical evidence supporting the tree's removal, demonstrates the inadequacy of alternative management strategies, and proposes a replacement plan to sustain environmental and aesthetic contributions. Technical Evidence Supporting Removal Structural Defects and Risk of Failure Significant Crack and Decay: The Pin Oak has a large crack from the base to 2 meters, with internal decay probed to a depth of 6 inches, indicating severe structural degradation. This creates a high risk of stem failure, especially during adverse weather. High-Risk Target Area: Proximity to the property at 72 Stanley Road poses a hazard to occupants and the building. Surrounding structures further amplify the risks posed by the tree's instability. Unsuitability of Location Though not yet mature, the tree's location close to the house and other structures makes it unsuitable. As it grows, its root system and canopy will increase risks to properties. Its placement behind the house also offers low public amenity value. Physiological Decline Lack of Foliage: Documented low foliage and bud burst over multiple seasons indicate severe stress and irreversible decline. Limitations of Remedial Options Crown Reduction Ineffectiveness: Crown reduction cannot resolve structural issues caused by internal decay. Extensive pruning would likely accelerate decline by increasing vulnerability to further decay and infection. Risk Management Limitations: Advanced decay and proximity to the property make retaining the tree unacceptably risky, even with monitoring or mitigation. Occupiers' Liability The tree's defects create significant legal liability under the Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 & 1984. Retaining a dangerous tree in a high-risk area exposes the landowner to liability if it fails. Alignment with TPO Exemptions Under the Town and Country Planning Act, exemptions to TPO ...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Works to Trees Under TPO
Approved
2025-01-20
T1 Quercus palustris (Pin Oak): Fell to ground level Reasons: Please see Tree
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Works to Trees Under TPO
Refused
2024-10-21
T2 Oak 12m high - Fell Reasons: Although not yet fully grown, has already reached a considerable size. Its continued growth poses significant concerns due to its location and the impact on the property. I wish to outline the key reasons why removal is not only advisable but necessary: 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Works to Trees Under TPO
Refused
2024-08-19
T1 Macrocarpa 16m high: Reduce the lateral branches only by up to 2m, to leave a finished lateral spread. height and width to remain the same Reason: Routine maintenance 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
No objection
2024-08-19
T1 = 1 x Atlantic Cedar to be crown reduced in volume from 15 x 15 m (Approx.) to 12 x 12 m (Approx.) leaving a balanced crown BS 3998-2010 Reasons for work: To relieve property of overhanging limbs. Public footpath, more light into garden.
26 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Works to Trees Under TPO
Approved
2023-11-27
Front Garden (Front Boundary) T1: Cedar tree - Tip reduction by 2 - 2.5 m from longest leaders, prune low right hand corner by 2.5m to clear from house, remove major deadwood Approx height 16m & spread 12m. Reduce height to 14m & spread to 10m Reason for work: General tree maintenance overhanging road and to reduce the weight from extended leaders
20A Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Applicant Ranganathan · Agent Mr Joe Coffill-Brown · Officer Jamie Albertsen
Works to Trees Under TPO
Approved
2023-07-07
Retrospective permission for the erection of rear garden outbuilding
18 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Full Application
Approved
2021-11-18
Installation of 6 no. rooflights on front and rear roof slopes
20A Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Full Application
Approved
2021-01-29
Single storey rear extension (6.00m depth, 3.00m eaves height, 3.50m maximum height).
42 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Officer Kreena Patel
Approved
2025-04-14
More
General Permitted Development Extension
Single storey rear extension, 6m in depth, 3.5m in height and 3m in height to eaves.
42 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Refused
2025-02-28
More
General Permitted Development Extension
T1 Quercus palustris (Pin Oak): Fell to Ground Level This submission outlines the technical evidence supporting the tree's removal, demonstrates the inadequacy of alternative management strategies, and proposes a replacement plan to sustain environmental and aesthetic contributions. Technical Evidence Supporting Removal Structural Defects and Risk of Failure Significant Crack and Decay: The Pin Oak has a large crack from the base to 2 meters, with internal decay probed to a depth of 6 inches, indicating severe structural degradation. This creates a high risk of stem failure, especially during adverse weather. High-Risk Target Area: Proximity to the property at 72 Stanley Road poses a hazard to occupants and the building. Surrounding structures further amplify the risks posed by the tree's instability. Unsuitability of Location Though not yet mature, the tree's location close to the house and other structures makes it unsuitable. As it grows, its root system and canopy will increase risks to properties. Its placement behind the house also offers low public amenity value. Physiological Decline Lack of Foliage: Documented low foliage and bud burst over multiple seasons indicate severe stress and irreversible decline. Limitations of Remedial Options Crown Reduction Ineffectiveness: Crown reduction cannot resolve structural issues caused by internal decay. Extensive pruning would likely accelerate decline by increasing vulnerability to further decay and infection. Risk Management Limitations: Advanced decay and proximity to the property make retaining the tree unacceptably risky, even with monitoring or mitigation. Occupiers' Liability The tree's defects create significant legal liability under the Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 & 1984. Retaining a dangerous tree in a high-risk area exposes the landowner to liability if it fails. Alignment with TPO Exemptions Under the Town and Country Planning Act, exemptions to TPO ...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Approved
2025-01-20
More
Works to Trees Under TPO
Show all 10 rows
T1 Quercus palustris (Pin Oak): Fell to ground level Reasons: Please see Tree
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Refused
2024-10-21
More
Works to Trees Under TPO
T2 Oak 12m high - Fell Reasons: Although not yet fully grown, has already reached a considerable size. Its continued growth poses significant concerns due to its location and the impact on the property. I wish to outline the key reasons why removal is not only advisable but necessary: 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Refused
2024-08-19
More
Works to Trees Under TPO
T1 Macrocarpa 16m high: Reduce the lateral branches only by up to 2m, to leave a finished lateral spread. height and width to remain the same Reason: Routine maintenance 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...
72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
No objection
2024-08-19
More
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
T1 = 1 x Atlantic Cedar to be crown reduced in volume from 15 x 15 m (Approx.) to 12 x 12 m (Approx.) leaving a balanced crown BS 3998-2010 Reasons for work: To relieve property of overhanging limbs. Public footpath, more light into garden.
26 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Approved
2023-11-27
More
Works to Trees Under TPO
Front Garden (Front Boundary) T1: Cedar tree - Tip reduction by 2 - 2.5 m from longest leaders, prune low right hand corner by 2.5m to clear from house, remove major deadwood Approx height 16m & spread 12m. Reduce height to 14m & spread to 10m Reason for work: General tree maintenance overhanging road and to reduce the weight from extended leaders
20A Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Applicant Ranganathan · Agent Mr Joe Coffill-Brown · Officer Jamie Albertsen
Approved
2023-07-07
More
Works to Trees Under TPO
Retrospective permission for the erection of rear garden outbuilding
18 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Approved
2021-11-18
More
Full Application
Installation of 6 no. rooflights on front and rear roof slopes
20A Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ · premises record
Approved
2021-01-29
More
Full Application

Building control

Building-control records are not yet collected for Richmond Upon Thames — the register is being gathered borough by borough (held so far: Lambeth, Brent, Ealing, Westminster, City and others).

Place

What affects it?

No mapped designation intersects a premises point in this postcode in the current build. Open any premises above for its own designation record.

People

Who is involved?

Named on the latest 30 applications in this postcode — the party who applied, not the owner or occupier.

Name
Details
Applicant on 2 applications
Applicant on 1 application
Applicant on 1 application
Applicant on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Case officer on 5 applications
Applicant on 2 applications
Applicant on 1 application
Applicant on 1 application
Show all 10 rows
Applicant on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Agent on 1 application
Case officer on 5 applications
Development

What could it become?

Planning precedent86 applications and 86 mapped decisions in this postcode — precedent for what has been permitted and refused here.
Energy28 EPC records; ratings C: 13, D: 14, E: 1.
What is not assertedNo capacity, value or ownership claim is made at area level; those belong to individual premises records and their evidence.

Intent signals

Planning Atlas Pro

Ownership, finance and market signals recorded at addresses in this postcode — each with date and source. Signals are evidence of change, not a prediction.

8 intent signals recorded in this postcode
Repeat refusal · Price decline · Long hold
Subscribe to see the signals →
Boundary: OS Postcode Unit areas (Ordnance Survey), 2026-08-14. Planning records: canonical stage2. EPC: EPC register. Premises: OS AddressBase / UPRN.