T1 Gleditsia triacanthos: Fell Justification for Removal 1. Unsuitable Species for Location Gleditsia triacanthos is a large, fast-growing deciduous tree with an eventual height of over 12â15 metres. It is inappropriate for modest residential gardens due to its vigorous growth, broad canopy spread, and strong root system. In this case, the treeâs position in a small urban garden already exceeds the available space, with roots and canopy encroaching into areas they cannot be contained, posing risk to garden surfaces, neighbouring structures, and subsurface infrastructure. 2. Ongoing Management Burden Though not yet mature, the tree already needs regular pruning to control spread. Annual or biennial crown reductions are essential to reduce shading, prevent crown overhang into adjacent properties, and minimise root incursion. These repeated works cause ongoing cost and disruption and are not a permanent solution. The tree regenerates quickly after pruning, leading to a cycle of intensive, unsustainable maintenance. 3. Adverse Impact on Garden Use The treeâs scale and placement dominate the garden, limiting recreational use, planting, and design. The canopy casts dense shade, making lawn growth and other planting difficult. The low branch framework and lateral spread hinder use of space underneath. Though slightly offset, the tree occupies the heart of the gardenâs usable area, restricting layout and enjoyment of the space. 4. Limited Public Amenity Value While Gleditsia can be attractive in larger or open settings, this particular tree contributes no significant visual value in its enclosed setting. It is not visible from public roads or footpaths and does not form part of any notable view corridor. Its removal would have no impact on the wider streetscape or public visual amenity. 5. No Loss of Screening or Habitat The garden is already well screened with mature shrubs and boundary trees. Removing this tree will not reduce privacy or green cover. Ecological value is minimal, and felling will be timed outside bird nesting season (March to August) or subject to an ecology check if required. 6. Replacement Planting (if Required) If requested by the Council, a replacement tree of more suitable scale and species can be planted in a more appropriate garden position. Options include Amelanchier, Sorbus, or ornamental fruit trees. These provide seasonal interest and support biodiversity without causing structural or spatial issues. Conclusion This Gleditsia is unsuited to its domestic setting. Its size, growth habit, and high management demands already affect garden use, and these impacts will worsen as it matures. Removal will relieve pressure on the space without affecting public views or habitat value. If needed, replacement planting can ensure continued contribution to garden ecology and aesthetics.
T1 Gleditsia -REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 9m to 6m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 6m to 4m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - general maintenance following species pruning cycle. T2 Eucalyptus - REDUCE HEIGHT by 4m from 9m to 5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 6m to 4m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - general maintenance and light penetration to property T3 Bay - REDUCE HEIGHT by 2m from 4.5m to 2.5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 3m to 1.5m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - routine maintenance and prevent encroachment on building T4 Acer - RE-POLLARD REDUCE HEIGHT by 0.5m from 2m to 1.5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 0.5m from 2m to 1.5m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard ensuring shape is maintained. Reason - routine maintenance and to allow light in to house
T1 - Laurel Bush to be reduced from 5m high to 3m high; and from 4m wide to 3m wide due to excessive shading and bush bush too large for size of garden. T2 - Elder tree to be removed due to a bracket fungus found at the base of the tree. Roots are damaging the wall and there are signs of parts of the tree dying; therefore unsafe.
T2 Eucalyptus: Reduce by up to 4-5m from 11m to 6m Reason: Routine maintenance T1 Gleditsia: Reduce by 2.5m from all aspects leaving a finished height od approx 8m high and 4-5m wide Reason: Tree has outgrown location, shading to control shape and size
Almond Tree to be cut down. The almond is over 50 years old. It has recently shifted and is leaning against a swing seat which is buckling under the pressure An arborist from Complete Tree Care Ltd visited today and says it is liable to collapse at any time. They are proposing to cut it down this Friday or following Monday.
T1 Gleditsia triacanthos: Fell Justification for Removal 1. Unsuitable Species for Location Gleditsia triacanthos is a large, fast-growing deciduous tree with an eventual height of over 12â15 metres. It is inappropriate for modest residential gardens due to its vigorous growth, broad canopy spread, and strong root system. In this case, the treeâs position in a small urban garden already exceeds the available space, with roots and canopy encroaching into areas they cannot be contained, posing risk to garden surfaces, neighbouring structures, and subsurface infrastructure. 2. Ongoing Management Burden Though not yet mature, the tree already needs regular pruning to control spread. Annual or biennial crown reductions are essential to reduce shading, prevent crown overhang into adjacent properties, and minimise root incursion. These repeated works cause ongoing cost and disruption and are not a permanent solution. The tree regenerates quickly after pruning, leading to a cycle of intensive, unsustainable maintenance. 3. Adverse Impact on Garden Use The treeâs scale and placement dominate the garden, limiting recreational use, planting, and design. The canopy casts dense shade, making lawn growth and other planting difficult. The low branch framework and lateral spread hinder use of space underneath. Though slightly offset, the tree occupies the heart of the gardenâs usable area, restricting layout and enjoyment of the space. 4. Limited Public Amenity Value While Gleditsia can be attractive in larger or open settings, this particular tree contributes no significant visual value in its enclosed setting. It is not visible from public roads or footpaths and does not form part of any notable view corridor. Its removal would have no impact on the wider streetscape or public visual amenity. 5. No Loss of Screening or Habitat The garden is already well screened with mature shrubs and boundary trees. Removing this tree will not reduce privacy or green cover. Ecological value is minimal, and felling will be timed outside bird nesting season (March to August) or subject to an ecology check if required. 6. Replacement Planting (if Required) If requested by the Council, a replacement tree of more suitable scale and species can be planted in a more appropriate garden position. Options include Amelanchier, Sorbus, or ornamental fruit trees. These provide seasonal interest and support biodiversity without causing structural or spatial issues. Conclusion This Gleditsia is unsuited to its domestic setting. Its size, growth habit, and high management demands already affect garden use, and these impacts will worsen as it matures. Removal will relieve pressure on the space without affecting public views or habitat value. If needed, replacement planting can ensure continued contribution to garden ecology and aesthetics.
T1 Gleditsia -REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 9m to 6m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 6m to 4m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - general maintenance following species pruning cycle. T2 Eucalyptus - REDUCE HEIGHT by 4m from 9m to 5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 6m to 4m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - general maintenance and light penetration to property T3 Bay - REDUCE HEIGHT by 2m from 4.5m to 2.5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 2m from 3m to 1.5m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard Reason - routine maintenance and prevent encroachment on building T4 Acer - RE-POLLARD REDUCE HEIGHT by 0.5m from 2m to 1.5m, REDUCE RADIUS by 0.5m from 2m to 1.5m on all compass points. Reason: Routine maintenance / Re pollard ensuring shape is maintained. Reason - routine maintenance and to allow light in to house
T1 - Laurel Bush to be reduced from 5m high to 3m high; and from 4m wide to 3m wide due to excessive shading and bush bush too large for size of garden. T2 - Elder tree to be removed due to a bracket fungus found at the base of the tree. Roots are damaging the wall and there are signs of parts of the tree dying; therefore unsafe.
T2 Eucalyptus: Reduce by up to 4-5m from 11m to 6m Reason: Routine maintenance T1 Gleditsia: Reduce by 2.5m from all aspects leaving a finished height od approx 8m high and 4-5m wide Reason: Tree has outgrown location, shading to control shape and size
Almond Tree to be cut down. The almond is over 50 years old. It has recently shifted and is leaning against a swing seat which is buckling under the pressure An arborist from Complete Tree Care Ltd visited today and says it is liable to collapse at any time. They are proposing to cut it down this Friday or following Monday.
Building-control records are not yet collected for Richmond Upon Thames — the register is being gathered borough by borough (held so far: Lambeth, Brent, Ealing, Westminster, City and others).
Place
What affects it?
Designations are shown per premises today (open any premises above); the postcode-level designation summary is built with the borough entity run. Use the map's designations filter to see them over the postcode now.
People
Who is involved?
Named on the latest 30 applications in this postcode — the party who applied, not the owner or occupier.
Planning precedent77 applications and 0 mapped decisions in this postcode — precedent for what has been permitted and refused here.
Energy15 EPC records; ratings C: 4, D: 5, E: 6.
What is not assertedNo capacity, value or ownership claim is made at area level; those belong to individual premises records and their evidence.
Intent signals · Planning Atlas Pro
Ownership, finance and market signals recorded at addresses in this postcode — each with date and source. Signals are evidence of change, not a prediction.