Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesWhitton Ward - Historic [WHW] ward01/0266
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

01/0266.

Chase Bridge School, Kneller Road Twickenham

Full / Other Planning at Chase Bridge School, Kneller Road Twickenham, received 2 Feb 2001 — approved on 5 Jul 2001 by committee.

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Jul 2001
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Tarmac Playground For Use By Children In Two New Classrooms.

Reference
01/0266
Type
Full Application
Postcode
TW2 7DE
Received
2 Feb 2001
Target date
30 Mar 2001
Decision date
5 Jul 2001
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Granted
Reference
01/0266
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Postcode
TW2 7DE
Received
2 Feb 2001
Target date
30 Mar 2001
Decision date
5 Jul 2001
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Granted
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
7 Dec 2010
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
DECISION NOTICE
7 Dec 2010
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Show all 4 rows
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Jul 2001, determined by the planning committee — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Feb 2001
Application received
30 Mar 2001
Statutory target date
5 Jul 2001
Committee decision: Approved
2 Feb 2001
Application received
30 Mar 2001
Statutory target date
5 Jul 2001
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.