Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Kew Ward - Historic [KEW] ward5 Bessant Drive Richmond›02/0965
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

02/0965.

5 Bessant Drive Richmond

Full / Other Planning at 5 Bessant Drive Richmond, received 3 Apr 2002 — approved on 16 Aug 2002 (delegated, Chris Tankard).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
16 Aug 2002
19 wks
Decision time
11 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
1
Documents
1 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Variation Of Condition (iv) Of Planning Permission Ref: App/l581/a/92/214802 To

Reference
02/0965
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Apr 2002
Target date
29 May 2002
Decision date
16 Aug 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
02/0965
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Apr 2002
Target date
29 May 2002
Decision date
16 Aug 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
20 Oct 2010
DECISION NOTICE
20 Oct 2010

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 16 Aug 2002, delegated decision by Chris Tankard — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Apr 2002
Application received
29 May 2002
Statutory target date
16 Aug 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Chris Tankard
3 Apr 2002
Application received
29 May 2002
Statutory target date
16 Aug 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Chris Tankard

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.