Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Kew Ward - Historic [KWA] wardLayton House Ferry Lane Kew›02/3840
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

02/3840.

Layton House Ferry Lane Kew

Full / Other Planning at Layton House Ferry Lane Kew, received 21 Feb 2003 — approved on 5 Feb 2004 by committee.

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Feb 2004
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
21
Conditions
attached to the decision
1
Documents
1 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed Change Of Use From B1 (offices) To D1 (educational).

Reference
02/3840
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
21 Feb 2003
Target date
18 Apr 2003
Decision date
5 Feb 2004
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
02/3840
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
21 Feb 2003
Target date
18 Apr 2003
Decision date
5 Feb 2004
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
OFFICER PHOTOS
5 Feb 2007
OFFICER PHOTOS
5 Feb 2007

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Feb 2004, determined by the planning committee — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Feb 2003
Application received
18 Apr 2003
Statutory target date
5 Feb 2004
Committee decision: Approved
21 Feb 2003
Application received
18 Apr 2003
Statutory target date
5 Feb 2004
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.