Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames
07/4047/COU. 245 Sandycombe Road Richmond Surrey TW9 2EW
Change of Use at 245 Sandycombe Road Richmond Surrey TW9 2EW, received 21 Nov 2007 — refused on 14 Jan 2008 (delegated, Victoria Crosby (Expired)).
Applications Designations · 0 of 21 on▾
Refused
Outcome
14 Jan 2008
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Proposed change of use of ground floor from retail into one bedroom flat.
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Show all 15 rows Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF USE
30 Nov 2007
SITE LOCATION PLAN
30 Nov 2007
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
30 Nov 2007
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 2308/2
30 Nov 2007
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS 2308/1
30 Nov 2007
APPLICANT LETTER
24 Dec 2007
PLANNING NOTICE CONFIRMATION
10 Jan 2008
CASE FILE COVER
21 Jan 2008
APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF USE
30 Nov 2007
SITE LOCATION PLAN
30 Nov 2007
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
30 Nov 2007
Show all 10 rows PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 2308/2
30 Nov 2007
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS 2308/1
30 Nov 2007
APPLICANT LETTER
24 Dec 2007
PLANNING NOTICE CONFIRMATION
10 Jan 2008
CASE FILE COVER
21 Jan 2008
Show 10 more documents · 25 remaining Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗
Refused on 14 Jan 2008, delegated decision by Victoria Crosby (Expired) — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline 21 Nov 2007
Application received
16 Jan 2008
Statutory target date
14 Jan 2008
Delegated decision: Refused · Victoria Crosby (Expired)
Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Allowed
21 Nov 2007
Application received
16 Jan 2008
Statutory target date
14 Jan 2008
Delegated decision: Refused · Victoria Crosby (Expired)
Show all 4 rows Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Allowed
Appeal Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Public response Comment counts were not captured for this application.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application) No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.