Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesTwickenham Riverside Ward - Historic [TWR] ward16/1875/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

16/1875/FUL.

28 - 30 Queens Road Twickenham

Full / Other Planning at 28 - 30 Queens Road Twickenham, received 12 May 2016 — approved on 28 Jul 2017 (delegated, Kreena Patel).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jul 2017
63 wks
Decision time
55 wks over the 8-week target
10
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

External alterations to rear elevation, rear extension at lower ground, ground and 2nd floor level, new rear dormer windows and two new windows to front elevation.

Reference
16/1875/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
12 May 2016
Validated
24 Jun 2016
Target date
19 Aug 2016
Decision date
28 Jul 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Reference
16/1875/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
12 May 2016
Validated
24 Jun 2016
Target date
19 Aug 2016
Decision date
28 Jul 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Jul 2017, delegated decision by Kreena Patel — 63 weeks from submission (55 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 May 2016
Application received
24 Jun 2016
Application validated
19 Aug 2016
Statutory target date
28 Jul 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Kreena Patel
12 May 2016
Application received
24 Jun 2016
Application validated
19 Aug 2016
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Jul 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Kreena Patel

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.