Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Ham, Petersham & Richmond Riverside Ward [HMP] ward›16/3553/DD04
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

16/3553/DD04.

St Michaels Convent 56 Ham Common Ham Richmond TW10 7JH

Discharge of Conditions at St Michaels Convent 56 Ham Common Ham Richmond TW10 7JH — approved on 21 Jul 2025 (delegated, Sarah Griffee).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
21 Jul 2025
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Details pursuant to condition U41872 - Specified details

Reference
16/3553/DD04
Type
Condition Approval
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
TW10 7JH
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
30 Sep 2020
Decision date
21 Jul 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
16/3553/DD04
Type
Condition Approval
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
TW10 7JH
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
30 Sep 2020
Decision date
21 Jul 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 21 Jul 2025, delegated decision by Sarah Griffee.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Sep 2020
Application validated
21 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Approved · Sarah Griffee
30 Sep 2020
Application validated
21 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Approved · Sarah Griffee

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.