Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…East Sheen Ward - Historic [EAS] ward›18/2353/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

18/2353/FUL.

76A Richmond Park Road East Sheen London SW14 8LA

Full Planning Permission at 76A Richmond Park Road East Sheen London SW14 8LA, received 26 Jul 2018 — approved on 25 Apr 2019 (delegated, Rachel Dodd (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Apr 2019
39 wks
Decision time
31 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a new indoor swimming pool with internal changing rooms and plant room

Reference
18/2353/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW14 8LA
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2018
Decision date
25 Apr 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
18/2353/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW14 8LA
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2018
Decision date
25 Apr 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 25 Apr 2019, delegated decision by Rachel Dodd (Expired) — 39 weeks from submission (31 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jul 2018
Application received
25 Apr 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Dodd (Expired)
26 Jul 2018
Application received
25 Apr 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Rachel Dodd (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.