Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesTwickenham Riverside Ward - Historic [TWR] ward18/2714/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

18/2714/FUL.

Arlington Works 23 - 27 Arlington Road Twickenham TW1 2BB

Full Planning Permission at Arlington Works 23 - 27 Arlington Road Twickenham TW1 2BB, received 23 Aug 2018 — refused on 19 Sep 2019 (delegated, Fiona Dyson (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Sep 2019
56 wks
Decision time
48 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Redevelopment of the site to provide 610sqm of commercial space (B1 Use Class) within existing Buildings of Townscape Merit plus a new build unit, 24 residential units in two blocks (5 x 1 bedroom flats, 12 x 2 bedroom flats and 7 x 3 bedroom flats) and associated car parking and landscaping and other works.

Reference
18/2714/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Postcode
TW1 2BB
Received
23 Aug 2018
Decision date
19 Sep 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Reference
18/2714/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 13 rows
Agent / consultant
Postcode
TW1 2BB
Received
23 Aug 2018
Decision date
19 Sep 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 Sep 2019, delegated decision by Fiona Dyson (Expired) — 56 weeks from submission (48 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Aug 2018
Application received
19 Sep 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson (Expired)
23 Aug 2018
Application received
19 Sep 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.