Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Teddington Ward [TDD] ward›18/3816/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

18/3816/FUL.

Bushy Park Lodge Sandy Lane Teddington TW11 0DR

Full Planning Permission at Bushy Park Lodge Sandy Lane Teddington TW11 0DR, received 13 Dec 2018 — no determination on 16 Jun 2022 (delegated, Emer Costello).

Richmond Upon Thames›Teddington Ward [TDD]›TW11 0DR›18/3816/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
No determination
Outcome
16 Jun 2022
183 wks
Decision time
175 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of Use from C1 Guest House to C3(a) Residential to provide 8Nos. studio and 1No. 2 bed self-contained flats for occupation by people experiencing homelessness. Provision of car parking and cycle storage at the front.

Reference
18/3816/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW11 0DR
Ward
Council
Received
13 Dec 2018
Decision date
16 Jun 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
18/3816/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW11 0DR
Ward
Council
Received
13 Dec 2018
Decision date
16 Jun 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

No determination on 16 Jun 2022, delegated decision by Emer Costello — 183 weeks from submission (175 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Dec 2018
Application received
16 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: No determination · Emer Costello
13 Dec 2018
Application received
16 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: No determination · Emer Costello

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.