Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…St. Margarets & North Twickenham Ward - Historic [STM] ward›19/0334/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

19/0334/FUL.

387 St Margarets Road Twickenham TW1 1PP

Full Planning Permission at 387 St Margarets Road Twickenham TW1 1PP, received 21 Jun 2019 — refused on 5 Nov 2019 (delegated, Fiona Dyson (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Nov 2019
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of existing rear extension to facilitate the change of use of premises from existing A3 (restaurant) use and C3 (residential) use to D1 use to provide a children's day care nursery for maximum 50 children.

Reference
19/0334/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW1 1PP
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2019
Decision date
5 Nov 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
19/0334/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW1 1PP
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2019
Decision date
5 Nov 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Nov 2019, delegated decision by Fiona Dyson (Expired) — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jun 2019
Application received
5 Nov 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson (Expired)
21 Jun 2019
Application received
5 Nov 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiona Dyson (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.