Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…South Twickenham Ward - Historic [SOT] ward›19/2789/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

19/2789/FUL.

Lockcorp House 75 Norcutt Road Twickenham TW2 6SR

Full Planning Permission at Lockcorp House 75 Norcutt Road Twickenham TW2 6SR, received 25 Sep 2019 — approved on 18 Jun 2020 (delegated, William Tysterman (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
18 Jun 2020
38 wks
Decision time
30 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing commercial building and erection of building to provide 15 affordable residential units, together with 12 parking spaces and communal amenity space.

Reference
19/2789/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW2 6SR
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2019
Decision date
18 Jun 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
19/2789/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
TW2 6SR
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2019
Decision date
18 Jun 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 18 Jun 2020, delegated decision by William Tysterman (Expired) — 38 weeks from submission (30 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Sep 2019
Application received
18 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · William Tysterman (Expired)
25 Sep 2019
Application received
18 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · William Tysterman (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.