Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesFulwell & Hampton Hill Ward - Historic [FHH] ward19/3201/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

19/3201/FUL.

St Clare Business Park And 7 - 11 Windmill Road Hampton Hill

Full Planning Permission at St Clare Business Park And 7 - 11 Windmill Road Hampton Hill, received 22 Oct 2019 — refused on 7 Jan 2021 (delegated, Simon Graham-Smith).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Jan 2021
63 wks
Decision time
55 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing buildings to provide a mixed use building between three and five storeys plus basement in height comprising 98 residential flats (class C3) and 600 sq.m of commercial floorspace (class B1), a three storey building comprising 894 sq.m of commercial floorspace (class B1) and 14 residential houses (class C3), access, external landscaping and car parking.

Reference
19/3201/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
22 Oct 2019
Decision date
7 Jan 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Reference
19/3201/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 12 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
22 Oct 2019
Decision date
7 Jan 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Jan 2021, delegated decision by Simon Graham-Smith — 63 weeks from submission (55 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Oct 2019
Application received
7 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Simon Graham-Smith
22 Oct 2019
Application received
7 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Simon Graham-Smith

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.