Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesSouth Richmond Ward - Historic [SRW] ward20/1703/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

20/1703/FUL.

Telecommunication Mast Roofttop 90528 Lichfield Court Sheen Road Richmond

Full / Other Planning at Telecommunication Mast Roofttop 90528 Lichfield Court Sheen Road Richmond, received 22 Jun 2020 — refused on 17 Sep 2020 (delegated, Jim Thomson (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Sep 2020
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
35
Documents
35 linked
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of 4no existing antennas and a free-standing frame from the rooftop plantroom, installation of 4no antenna apertures and new supporting apparatus plus 2no antenna apertures to be mounted onto existing steelwork, an internal equipment upgrade and installation of handrails and cat ladder at roof level.

Reference
20/1703/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Received
22 Jun 2020
Validated
26 Jun 2020
Target date
21 Aug 2020
Decision date
17 Sep 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Refused
Reference
20/1703/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Received
22 Jun 2020
Validated
26 Jun 2020
Target date
21 Aug 2020
Decision date
17 Sep 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Form
22 Jun 2020
5G and Future Technology
22 Jun 2020
Existing Elevation Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004
22 Jun 2020
Existing Site Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020
ICNIRP Certificate
22 Jun 2020
Supplementary Information
22 Jun 2020
Internal Room Layout 504130_RUT016_905280122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020
Proposed Maximum Configuration Elevation Plan 504130_RUT016_
22 Jun 2020
Proposed Maximum Configuration Site Plan 504130_RUT016_90528
22 Jun 2020
Site Location Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020
Application Form
22 Jun 2020
5G and Future Technology
22 Jun 2020
Existing Elevation Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004
22 Jun 2020
Show all 10 rows
Existing Site Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020
ICNIRP Certificate
22 Jun 2020
Supplementary Information
22 Jun 2020
Internal Room Layout 504130_RUT016_905280122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020
Proposed Maximum Configuration Elevation Plan 504130_RUT016_
22 Jun 2020
Proposed Maximum Configuration Site Plan 504130_RUT016_90528
22 Jun 2020
Site Location Plan 504130_RUT016_90528_TW0122_M004 D
22 Jun 2020

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Sep 2020, delegated decision by Jim Thomson (Expired) — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Jun 2020
Application received
26 Jun 2020
Application validated
21 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
17 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Thomson (Expired)
Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Allowed
22 Jun 2020
Application received
26 Jun 2020
Application validated
21 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
17 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Thomson (Expired)
Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Allowed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Allowed

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.