Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Ham, Petersham & Richmond Riverside Ward [HMP] ward›22/0195/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

22/0195/FUL.

Rose Of York Petersham Road Richmond TW10 6UY

Full / Other Planning at Rose Of York Petersham Road Richmond TW10 6UY — refused on 12 May 2023.

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 May 2023
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Refurbishment and extension of the Rose of York Public House to provide an addit

Reference
22/0195/FUL
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
TW10 6UY
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
27 Jan 2022
Decision date
12 May 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
22/0195/FUL
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
TW10 6UY
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
27 Jan 2022
Decision date
12 May 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 May 2023.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Jan 2022
Application validated
12 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
27 Jan 2022
Application validated
12 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.