Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesTeddington Ward [TDD] ward22/2935/FUL
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

22/2935/FUL.

Unit 3, 4 And 5 Plough Lane Teddington

Full / Other Planning at Unit 3, 4 And 5 Plough Lane Teddington, received 30 Sep 2022 — approved on 17 Mar 2023 (delegated, Thomas Faherty).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
17 Mar 2023
24 wks
Decision time
16 wks over the 8-week target
15
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use from B8 storage to Class E [g] iii Light Industrial Processes with associated works.

Reference
22/2935/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Received
30 Sep 2022
Validated
6 Feb 2023
Target date
3 Apr 2023
Decision date
17 Mar 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Granted
Reference
22/2935/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Received
30 Sep 2022
Validated
6 Feb 2023
Target date
3 Apr 2023
Decision date
17 Mar 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Granted
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 17 Mar 2023, delegated decision by Thomas Faherty — 24 weeks from submission (16 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Sep 2022
Application received
6 Feb 2023
Application validated
3 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
17 Mar 2023
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Faherty
30 Sep 2022
Application received
6 Feb 2023
Application validated
3 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Mar 2023
Delegated decision: Approved · Thomas Faherty

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.