Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesHampton Wick & South Teddington Ward [HPK] ward23/2511/GPH01
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

23/2511/GPH01.

Riverside Court River Reach Teddington

Other at Riverside Court River Reach Teddington, received 8 Sep 2023 — refused on 4 Mar 2024 (delegated, Thomas Faherty).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Mar 2024
25 wks
Decision time
17 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of one additional storey to provide 5 additional residential flats.

Reference
23/2511/GPH01
Type
GPD P20A D'houses on detached flats
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
8 Sep 2023
Validated
11 Jan 2024
Target date
7 Mar 2024
Decision date
4 Mar 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Prior Approval Refused
Reference
23/2511/GPH01
Type
GPD P20A D'houses on detached flats
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
8 Sep 2023
Validated
11 Jan 2024
Target date
7 Mar 2024
Decision date
4 Mar 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Prior Approval Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Thomas Faherty — 25 weeks from submission (17 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Sep 2023
Application received
11 Jan 2024
Application validated
7 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
4 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Faherty
Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Dismissed
8 Sep 2023
Application received
11 Jan 2024
Application validated
7 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
4 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Thomas Faherty
Appeal
Written Evidence · Appeal Dismissed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Written Evidence
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.