Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›…Richmond Hill Ward - Historic [RHW] ward›96/2422/CAC
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

96/2422/CAC.

16-18 Petersham Road, Richmond

Listed Building at 16-18 Petersham Road, Richmond, received 15 Aug 1996 — refused on 7 Nov 1996 (delegated, Jane Bentley (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Nov 1996
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
1
Documents
1 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition Of Existing Cottage To Rear And Miscellaneous Out Buildings And Structures

Reference
96/2422/CAC
Type
Conservation Area Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
15 Aug 1996
Target date
10 Oct 1996
Decision date
7 Nov 1996
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
96/2422/CAC
Type
Conservation Area Consent
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
15 Aug 1996
Target date
10 Oct 1996
Decision date
7 Nov 1996
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
23 Dec 2010
DECISION NOTICE
23 Dec 2010

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Nov 1996, delegated decision by Jane Bentley (Expired) — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Aug 1996
Application received
10 Oct 1996
Statutory target date
7 Nov 1996
Delegated decision: Refused · Jane Bentley (Expired)
15 Aug 1996
Application received
10 Oct 1996
Statutory target date
7 Nov 1996
Delegated decision: Refused · Jane Bentley (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.